7 Comments

I appreciate how you classify these types of historical writing without creating a hierarchy of merit. Imagine if a field guide to birds claimed, for example, that birds of prey were more worthy of observation than shorebirds. No thanks. So, cheers for conveying the vitality of each of these ways of approaching historical writing.

Expand full comment

What a creative analogy! I suppose there is a hierarchy, though. But that is determined by purpose, and the purposes aren't hierarchical. Raptors are better at hunting; waterfowl at swimming. So when swimming is called for, I'm going with a duck. What is clearer to me today than, say, when I was in graduate school, is that historical writing can serve a variety of purposes. Age offers some perspective here; at least for me. Thanks for reading and commenting, Matt.

Expand full comment

Nice, thanks.

Expand full comment

What a wonderful look at how history is done, through presenting and commenting on these books. I think a lot about these elements going on in books of history, but more commonly social scientists'monographs. More to say, but another time I trust.

Expand full comment

Loved these recommendations, Adam, thank you!

Expand full comment

Adam, being a genre, category nerd, I really appreciate your breaking it down like this. Cheers, Victoria

Expand full comment

I'm glad it worked for you, Victoria. So nice to hear from you here, too.

Expand full comment